tech
February 2, 2026
A Social-Media Ban Really Could Do a Lot of Good
Australia’s experiment is the first of its kind, but the evidence from alcohol, drug, and other bans is promising.
TL;DR
- Australia has banned social media use for all children under 16.
- The ban is compared to existing age restrictions on drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, suggesting potential for positive outcomes.
- Concerns about children circumventing the ban are addressed, with the argument that perfectionism should not hinder progress.
- The social media ban is distinguished from the "War on Drugs," as it penalizes corporations, not individual users.
- Historical data on other age restrictions show a reduction in the targeted activities, despite imperfect compliance.
- Adolescence is identified as a critical period for habit formation, making early intervention with social media potentially impactful.
- Challenges in enforcing the social media ban are noted, particularly compared to regulating physical substances.
- Some research indicates that many teens desire to leave social media but feel social pressure to remain connected.
- The ban's political sustainability is questioned due to potential corporate opposition, but its structure may hinder broad repeal advocacy.
- The long-term trade-offs of the ban will need to be assessed by Australian voters.
Continue reading the original article