'War crime' as political smear
Any stalemate in negotiations to end both Iranian aggression in the Strait of Hormuz and their nuclear program should warrant the resumption of the bombing campaign against Iran. Greater destruction of Iran’s infrastructure may be needed to compel its military and political capitulation.
TL;DR
- Negotiation stalemates with Iran should lead to the resumption of bombing campaigns and potential infrastructure destruction.
- Claims that bombing Iran's infrastructure constitutes 'war crimes' are described as an 'appeasement ideology.'
- Targets like power plants and bridges are considered 'dual-use' and potentially lawful military objectives under international law.
- A Yale Law Journal article and the Department of Defense's Law of War Manual support the legality of targeting dual-use electrical power stations.