economy
March 6, 2026
Energy gridlock is holding the US back from 'all of the above' approach
In an era of geopolitical turbulence and technological revolution, the U.S.’s energy and economic security stands at a crossroads. Energy policy has become increasingly politicized with political purity tests shaping job prospects and interviews: if you support fossil fuels, you’re a Republican; if renewables, you’re a Democrat.
TL;DR
- Energy policy has become highly politicized, creating partisan divides on fossil fuels versus renewables.
- The U.S. needs to develop and deploy as much affordable and reliable energy as possible for economic sovereignty and to compete with China.
- Electricity demands are projected to double by 2050, driven by data centers, electrification, and reshoring, making cheap energy crucial for competitiveness.
- A pragmatic approach should align energy deployment with diverse geography and resources, allowing markets to drive innovation without favoritism.
- Empowering states and communities to tailor energy mixes, eschewing mandates and subsidies, fosters experimentation and adaptability.
- True market fairness involves streamlining permitting for all energy sources and ensuring transparent pricing, allowing entrepreneurs to compete on merits.
Continue reading the original article