One Problem With Attacking the Smithsonian? Americans Like It.

TL;DR

Public trust in institutions like universities, public schools, and media is at historic lows, but museums have largely been immune to these effects.
A majority of Americans, including 17% of Republicans, believe the president should have no or little influence over federally funded museum exhibits.
Surveys show that both liberals and conservatives disagree with removing content on sensitive topics like slavery and climate change from museums.
Museums are considered among the most trusted sources of information, just behind public libraries and personal relationships.
The White House has criticized the Smithsonian, accusing it of spreading divisive narratives and pushing for "ideological capture," leading to an executive order requiring untrustworthy signage outside the National Museum of American History.
Unlike other institutions, it is difficult to form easily accessible museum alternatives aligned with specific political perspectives.
Museums are seen as offering tangible, "real stuff" that fosters trust, providing a direct connection to the past.
Museums serve as rare, shared, bipartisan cultural spaces where people can gather and appreciate common historical artifacts.
Data suggests museums are not widely believed to have a political agenda, and both liberals and conservatives feel welcomed by them.

Continue reading the original article