Dining across the divide: ‘I think Starmer is a dead man walking. She wasn’t sold on that’
They were surprised to agree on some topics. But could the scientist and the lawyer see eye to eye on the future of the monarchy?
TL;DR
- Keith, a university lecturer, and Amanda, a family lawyer, had a dinner where they found themselves agreeing on many points.
- Keith believes the monarchy should be abolished due to the principle of inherited privilege, while Amanda argues for its practical benefits in revenue generation and its symbolic, non-ruling role.
- They discussed the use of national flags, with Keith advocating for freedom of display despite his dislike of their co-option by the far right, and Amanda expressing strong negative feelings about their official public display.
- Regarding politics, Keith expressed deep disappointment with Keir Starmer, calling him a 'dead man walking,' while Amanda was more optimistic, acknowledging his legal background but suggesting he's not a natural politician.
- Both participants concluded that society has become too culturally segregated and that discussions with those holding different opinions are valuable and necessary.