Could Trump’s Iran ‘excursion’ be a bigger global turning point than Vietnam?

TL;DR

The Iran conflict, though much smaller than Vietnam, is seen as a strategic defeat due to confused objectives and poor planning.
The war may represent a significant geopolitical shift, exposing the US's limitations in an interconnected world.
International consequences of the Iran war could be more long-lasting than those of Vietnam.
The conflict signals the collapse of Israel's strategy for regime change in Iran and impacts Gulf monarchies' geopolitical relationships.
The effectiveness of cheap drones as a modern conflict equalizer has been confirmed, with the US depleting missile stores and treasury.
The war's fallout may negatively impact European politics and challenge the EU's architecture.
US foreign policy establishment views the Iran missteps as confirmation of disorder caused by Trump's diplomacy.
The war has provided Iran with ideological revitalization and repaired its deterrence strategy.
Trump's predicament mirrors Lyndon B. Johnson's dilemma of choosing between high casualties or disgrace.
Trump's approach to the Iran war has followed stages similar to the US experience in Vietnam.
The US deployed its ultimate deterrent (war) against Iran, which proved ineffective.
The war was deemed illegal and reckless, with analysts predicting negative outcomes that largely materialized.
The alliance of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, and Pakistan has foreclosed Trump's return to conflict and may now lead in the Middle East.

Continue reading the original article