entertainment
Omission impossible: why the Oscars can never get their In Memoriam tribute right
Why did Brigitte Bardot, Farrah Fawcett and James Van Der Beek not warrant a mention when Michael Jackson did? The history of the Oscars tribute snubs says a lot about why some stars are gone but not forgotten
TL;DR
- The Oscars' In Memoriam segment, established in 1994, often draws criticism for excluding prominent figures.
- This year's omissions included Brigitte Bardot, James Van Der Beek, and Malcolm-Jamal Warner, sparking social media outrage.
- The selection process is managed by a committee that vets a longlist of hundreds down to about 30 individuals.
- Personal conduct and controversial statements (like Brigitte Bardot's or Alain Delon's) can lead to an actor's omission.
- Space limitations and the need to honor figures from various roles (actors, directors, producers, designers) also contribute to omissions.
- Performers primarily known for television work (like Van Der Beek or Warner) may be excluded, with the expectation that they will be honored by their respective industry awards (like the Emmys).
- Decisions can appear arbitrary, as seen with Farrah Fawcett's omission due to her 'remarkable television work' while Michael Jackson was included.
- Ultimately, any selection is bound to displease a portion of the audience, a fact acknowledged by past producers.