Michael might be a cowardly, cursed biopic but his fans are happy to live in a fantasy

TL;DR

The Michael Jackson biopic is a major commercial success despite poor critical reviews.
The film omits significant controversial aspects of Jackson's life, including child molestation accusations, due to legal restrictions and the estate's influence.
The estate's involvement led to a narrative that avoids depicting Jackson's accusers, a result of a settlement and a non-disparagement clause.
The movie is criticized for presenting a sanitized and overly positive portrayal of Jackson, catering to fans who prefer to ignore or deny controversies.
Despite the omissions, the film includes nods to later developments in Jackson's life, such as his Neverland ranch, which is linked to the allegations.
The film's portrayal of Jackson, played by his nephew Jaafar Jackson, emphasizes a 'too-pure-for-this-world' gentleness, avoiding any darkness.
The film's tone is described as a 'dog whistle' to certain audiences, aiming for a Trump-style belief in exoneration without explicit prejudice.
The success of biopics like 'Michael' and 'Bohemian Rhapsody' suggests a public preference for 'virtual resurrections' over traditional actor portrayals.
The film ends by teasing a sequel that might address less triumphant moments, which the author interprets as a potential 'perverse celebration of Jackson’s martyrdom' serving the most fanatical fans.
The article argues that the film, by avoiding controversy and complexity, is afraid of what makes artists human and avoids depicting a complicated individual.

Continuer la lecture de l'article original