Story
July 1, 2026
SoFi Stadium Workers Authorize Strike Ahead of World Cup
Approximately 2,000 workers at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles have voted to authorize a strike just before the start of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The union's primary concerns include the presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at the tournament and stalled contract negotiations.
Workers at Los Angeles’s SoFi Stadium are pitting labor rights and immigrant protections against the security and commercial machinery of one of the world’s biggest sporting events, just days before the 2026 FIFA World Cup kicks off.
Workers’ demands: wages, safety, and ICE-free games
From the union’s perspective, the strike authorization is leverage in stalled contract talks with stadium operator Legends Global. Workers argue they deserve “a greater share of the windfall” from a packed slate of mega-events, including the World Cup, Super Bowl, and Olympics, and want “a good, equitable contract for increasing our wages” in a state where “it’s very expensive” to live.1 Roughly 2,000 hospitality workers—96% of those voting—backed the strike authorization.2
Beyond pay, Unite Here Local 11 frames the dispute as a civil rights and safety issue. The union demands that FIFA and venue operators bar federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers from the stadium, saying the goal is to protect foreign-born workers and international visitors from fear of detention.1 One worker described colleagues on work visas as “a little bit scared of coming to work” if ICE is present.2
Security and corporate interests: silence and assurances
On the other side, federal officials emphasize that ICE’s role will be narrowly focused on “counterfeiters and traffickers,” according to the Department of Homeland Security.2 That framing prioritizes security and intellectual property enforcement over the union’s concerns about immigration policing.
Legends Global, which runs food and beverage operations, has repeatedly declined to comment during the escalating dispute.12 FIFA, already under scrutiny after the union and ACLU urged an investigation into its “data-collection practices” involving workers’ sensitive personal information,1 faces a broader critique of how it balances commercial, security, and human-rights obligations.
A broader clash over mega-events
The conflict exposes a deeper tension: global sports bodies and corporate partners view the World Cup as a commercial and branding bonanza, while local workers see a rare moment of leverage to demand economic security and protection from intrusive surveillance and immigration enforcement. With eight World Cup matches scheduled at SoFi Stadium,12 both sides are gambling that the other will blink before the world arrives.